Regulator begins HLOS consultation

The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) has begun consultations to look at how the rail industry will deliver government proposals to invest £4.2 billion in Britain’s rail network between 2014-19.

ORR says the process, which follows the announcement last month of the biggest programme of investment in the railways for 150 years, aims to ensure Network Rail provides high-quality improvements while delivering value for money for passengers.

July’s HLOS announcement outlined proposals including electrification of the Midland Main Line between Bedford and Sheffield, a new £500 million rail link between the Great Western Main Line and Heathrow and completion of the Northern Hub to add capacity between Manchester and Liverpool.

ORR chief executive Richard Price said: “Governments in England, Wales and Scotland have set out what they Britain’s railways to achieve between 2014-19, and have shown they are ready to back this with massive levels of investment.

“Now ORR and the rail industry need to establish the best way of delivering those plans, providing passengers and taxpayers with a railway which delivers safety, high performance, extra capacity and value for money.

The consultation is seeking views on financial issues including the level of Network Rail’s debt and its exposure to changes in inflation.

Price added: “Today we are seeking views on Network Rail’s financial and performance frameworks, which will lay the foundations towards delivering a world class rail service.”

Russian railways shoot for Olympic gold

0

Clinging to a narrow strip of coastline between the Caucasus Mountains and the Black Sea, the 150 kilometre long Sochi conurbation is the world’s second-longest after Los Angeles. Its terrain is such that planes can only land at its airport from the sea. In Russia, Sochi is a popular tourist resort with long beaches, tropical palms, sunshine and a humid subtropical climate. In 2007, it was chosen to host the 2014 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games.

Although this might seem an odd choice, Sochi does have a mountain winter resort 48 kilometres inland where the outdoor events will be held. Indoor games are to be held on the coast at a new Olympic Park which, after the games, will be the site of the first Russian Grand Prix. Given that most of the £21 billion being spent preparing for these games is on infrastructure improvements, the rail engineer was keen to accept an invitation from Russian Railways (RZD) to see its Olympic rail improvements.

Into the mountains

As the mountain venue is currently reached by a twisting narrow road through a deep river valley, a new high capacity road / rail corridor is required. This project includes a 50km road with six major junctions and a 48km railway with two new stations. This line will be electrified at 25kV and climbs to 560 metres with a maximum gradient of 1 in 25. It is single tracked in the mountains with four dynamic loops, giving a capacity of four train pairs per hour. Due to the demanding nature of the terrain, 46% of this new line consists of bridges or tunnels. This explains why the project’s cost is £4.5 billion, of which 60% is the new rail line.

With such a narrow corridor, road and rail construction is inseparable. For example, there are three tunnel complexes where parallel road and rail tunnels share the same service tunnel. As shown in the table, 12 tunnels totalling 27.4km are being constructed by Tunnel Boring Machines (TBM), Roadheaders (RH) or Drilling and Blasting (DB). TBMs are both German Herrenknecht and Canadian Lovat machines. Rail, road and service tunnels are typically 10.6, 13.2 and 6.2 metres in diameter. All rail tunnels are single tracked, except for the double tracked Number 6 tunnel, and the scheme won New Civil Engineer’s Major Tunnelling Project of the year in 2011.

Bridges galore

The project includes 23 rail and 23 road bridges, totalling 11.5 km and 9 km respectively, criss-crossing the river Mzymta. Bridge designers had to take account of the region being subject to earthquakes and a curvature radius of 600 to 1200 metres for most of the rail bridges.

The large number of bridges, required by the design to minimise the impact on the river bed, meant that they could be built in kit form with standard components. Beam spans ranged from 18 to 34 metres and trussed girders from 55 to 110 metres. The exception is a 766 metre cable-stayed road bridge, with pylons 82 metres high and a maximum span of 312 metres. At this location, the river runs directly below the line of the road and the long bridge removes the need for pylons in the river.

The project’s enabling works are a further indication of its scale. These include eight work camps housing 7,800 people, five access roads totalling 37km and 10 temporary bridges. Electrical substations at the tunnel portals have a total capacity of 41.3 MW and are fed from 40km of new power lines. On the coast, two freight yards were opened in 2009, one for aggregates and one for construction components, with annual capacities of 11 million and 3.7 million tons respectively. The largest construction facility is a tunnel lining plant that also houses 570 workers. The production capacity of its four production lines, which produce various types of lining, is 15,000 cubic metres per month.

A controversial aspect of the project is its environmental impact on the Sochi National park, in particular the river Mzymta. In consultation with Greenpeace Russia and the Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF), the design was changed to either avoid particularly sensitive areas or to minimise impact by the use of elevated structures. Other mitigation measures include planting 163,000 rare plants, the provision of animal crossings and releasing 50,000 salmon yearlings into the river. Once construction is complete the riverbed and floodplain will be subject to remedial works.

Visiting the project in May 2012, it is clear that much has been achieved, including almost all of the tunnelling. RZD advises that work is 75% complete and are confident that the road / rail corridor will be completed by April 2013, after which there is a three month testing and commissioning programme to ensure the route is ready for the games in February 2014.

Along the coast

Until recently, the 103km railway between Tuapse and Adler had eight single-track sections totalling 30km. With Sochi’s Olympic preparations requiring an additional 65 million tons of freight, and the big increase in Olympic passenger traffic, these bottlenecks had to be removed. From 2008 until April this year these sections have been progressively doubled, increasing the lines capacity from 54 to 70 train pairs per day. The construction of these second tracks required significant structures along the shore and two additional single track tunnels of 1km and 0.8km.

At Adler, the station is being rebuilt as a major interchange hub. One reason for this is that passengers using the newly opened Sochi airport line have to change here for Olympic venues. Another is to provide a park and ride facility and a maritime connection to reduce road congestion along the Black Sea coast. When completed, the station will have a floor area of 23,000 square metres on six levels. Its normal capacity is 15,000 passengers an hour, although during the Olympics it will be able to handle 24,000. Work on the station was well advanced when the rail engineer visited, during which cross bracing for earthquake protection could be seen. RZD expect to complete the station by the end of the year.

From Adler, a new 2.8km long railway to an elevated station at Sochi Airport was opened in February of this year. This railway included two tunnels (164 metres and 368 metres long), four bridges totalling 794 metres, and 980 metres of retaining walls. It has a capacity of four trains per hour and is expected to carry 60% of all airline passengers during the games.

The train just arrived from Germany

Doubtless Sochi’s rail infrastructure will be ready for its games, but what of the trains to run on it? In May, the first new Olympic train had just arrived from Germany. From Siemens’ Krefeld factory north west of Düsseldorf, its journey involved a barge along the Rhine to Amsterdam, a coaster to Sassnitz, a train ferry to Ust Luga near St Petersburg, from where it ran 2,500km to Sochi.

This journey started in 2009 with an agreement between RZD and Siemens to develop and deliver 38 five-car suburban electric multiple units (EMUs). To Siemens, these trains are the Desiro RUS, the latest in their Desiro EMU family. In Russia, they have been named Lastochka, Russian for swallow.

This is the first of 294 such trains. However, few will make the tortuous journey from Krefeld. Part of RZD’s international strategy is localisation of production to both reduce the cost of trains and develop Russia’s manufacturing capability. Siemens have clearly bought into this strategy, having signed contracts in 2010 and 2011 to deliver a further 16 and 240 trains with respectively 35% and 80% of the production value in Russia. It is investing £160 million to construct a factory at Yekaterinburg for this purpose.

The Lastochka is a big train. At 3.5 metres wide it is 0.7 metres wider than its Scottish cousin, the class 380 Desiro unit which is also manufactured at Krefeld. This explains why, by UK standards, the Lastochka might be thought heavy at 54 tons per car. In fact, it has a lightweight body shell made up of aluminium fabrications and extruded profiles.

With this, and an intelligent traction control system, Siemens claim that their Desiro RUS will use 30% less energy than current Russian EMUs. There are power cars at each end of the five coach unit that deliver a total of 2,550kW. The trains have a dual voltage power supply, 3kV DC and 25kV AC, and are fitted with regenerative braking. They have been tested in Rail Tec Arsenal’s climatic wind tunnel in Vienna at temperatures between -40°C and +40°C, and underframe equipment is designed to prevent the accumulation of ice and snow.

KLUB Class Signalling

In-cab signalling is provided by a Unified Integrated Locomotive Safety System (KLUB-U), a system developed by RZD which uses coils under the train to detect AC pulse patterns in the track that denote signal aspects. KLUB-U uses GPS, supplemented by wheel sensors, and a stored electronic rail system map to display the train’s position, gradient, allowable speed and next significant asset. GPS is the Russian GLONASS (GLObalnaya NAvigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema) which is widely used by Russia’s railways with 12,000 rail vehicles using the system. The first KLUB device was certified in 1994 and there are now around 30,000 vehicles so fitted.

KLUB-U can override the driver to ensure maximum permitted speed is not exceeded and signals are not passed at danger. It also controls driver vigilance, applies sanders if required and records train movement data. If digital radio is available, KLUB-U requires radio authorisation to pass a signal at danger and give controllers the ability to remotely stop a train in an emergency.

Sochi’s Olympic lines will be a pilot to further development of this system by the use of digital radio, GLONASS and KLUB-U to provide radio block signalling that meets the requirements of ERTMS level 2. This is part of a £1.2 billion deal between RZD and Finmeccanica of Italy which will use Russian radio block signalling whilst the Italians provide telecoms expertise. The pilot scheme will also include a computerised traffic management system that can implement the optimum train service pattern to recover from any disruption.

Be the best you can be

The Olympic motto “Citius, Altius, Fortius” (Faster, Higher, Stronger) challenges individuals to become the best they can. Sochi’s Olympic rail investment, with an award winning tunnelling project and cutting-edge signalling system, shows how Russian Railways are also striving to be the best. RZD has come a long way since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 by restructuring, privatisation, introducing new technology, and by engaging with leading international rail companies such as Siemens and Finmeccanica. As a result, those who come to Sochi in 2014 will see the world’s best athletes and a world class railway.

Theory into Practice

0

Some of the most expensive consumables on a rail vehicle are its wheelsets and axle bearings which make up a significant part of an operator’s maintenance budget. Scrutiny of railway costs, triggered by the McNulty report, means that successful railway companies must achieve exceptional wheelset operational performance and at the same time maintain very high levels of safety performance.

In the rail engineer issue 93 (July 2012) we reported on the recent wheelset seminars held at the Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE). Topics reviewed included the management of safety, an overview of standards, testing processes and an insight into current research. This is indeed vital and impressive work, but out on the real railway, practical problem solving can be just as important.

New profile

Designed, built and maintained by Alstom, the class 390 Pendolino sets were introduced in 2002. This hard-working 57-strong fleet (574 vehicles) clocks up 17 million train miles per year. The operator, Virgin Trains, works closely with Alstom on engineering issues and together they have worked collaboratively with Network Rail in solving wheel/rail interface problems.

Dr Mark Burstow, principal vehicle track dynamics engineer, Network Rail, has recently presented a paper at the IMechE on this very subject. He described how, after reports of class 390 rough riding in the Hilmorton area near Rugby, a joint investigation by Network Rail, Virgin Trains and Alstom was undertaken. Analysis of track geometry, rail and wheel profiles revealed no special problems at Hilmorton, but the collected data was used to calculate wheel conicity.

High conicity may be attributed to worn rails/wheels or tight track gauge and it can result in a greater tendency for wheelsets to hunt. Calculations by Dr Burstow confirmed that hunting might be expected at the Hilmorton site, but only from worn P8 profile wheels. Rail grinding was undertaken in order to reduce gauge corner contact and this resulted in the conicity for worn wheels being reduced enough for stability to be restored. The drop was not significant however, and to avoid a return to instability a longer term solution was required.

As an alternative to changing the rail profile the wheel profile can be altered. P12 was the chosen profile, as it has a lower initial conicity than the commonly used P8. Increased flange wear had resulted when P12 was tried on the class 450 outer suburban EMU fleet, but Dr Burstow anticipated that the curvature of the WCML would reduce this problem. P12 was originally developed in order to reduce rolling contact fatigue (RCF) without a significant reduction in steering ability.

Virgin and Alstom decided to trial P12 initially on one trainset, with some P8 profiles retained as a control. The P12 trial trainset ran to 522,000 miles without major problems and flange height grew at the same rate as for P8. Flange wear for P12 was found to be less than for P8 between 50,000 and 200,000 miles. Some P12 conicity values approached instability at as much as 500,000 miles – almost twice that typically achieved by P8 profiles.

To provide a larger sample size and to see how well the P12 performed on smaller diameter wheels, rather than the new full-size wheels used in the original trial trainset, the scope of the trial was extended to include five further trainsets. So successful has this trial been that a decision has now been taken to extend the P12 wheel profile to the majority of the Pendolino fleet, with a small number of trainsets remaining with P8 wheels as a control sample. The lower conicity and reduced RCF damage should allow significant extension of wheel life.

Bearings

Class 91 locomotives were introduced as part of the East Coast Main Line modernisation and electrification programme of the late 1980s. These 4.7MW 140mph machines were built by GEC Alstom with BREL as a sub-contractor. They feature a low unsprung mass, having the traction motors mounted on the main frame rather than within the bogies. The target bogie overhaul period was set at 750,000 miles, but the complex transmission system and unconventional bogie design led to service problems.

Paul Sutherland, asset manager with Eversholt Rail, Tony Brown, head of engineering with East Coast, and John Simpson, Principal Engineer with Interfleet, outlined the problem-solving exercise – a story that spans 20-years, albeit with many years in hiatus.

On the class 91, a virtual traction centre is formed by the use of a Watt’s linkage, although the primary suspension system is conventional. Coil springs carry the vertical load and rolling rubber ring units provide lateral and yaw guidance. Timken 150mm roller bearing units with lithium grease lubrication (standard on BR at the time) had given excellent service in HSTs, Class 90s and freight applications, but this was not a dedicated high speed bearing. Failures started during 1994 after roughly 500,000 miles service, with blackening/oxidation of the grease, signs of overheating and fatigue spalling of the races.

The use of synthetic greases offered a way forward, giving lower base oil viscosity, lower operating temperature and better resistance to oxidation. Unfortunately the results were only partially successful, so new SKF bearings with Shell Nerita 2858 grease were then trialled. This exercise resulted in 12 failures within 10 months, so during 1994 a new Timken bearing was trialled along with Alvania 2760B grease. These bearings were proven on TGV trains and passed extensive rig testing, but in service on Class 91 the grease proved unstable and ran out of the bearings.

Misalignment

In 1997, Timken application engineers were consulted on a better solution. They offered the NG2 bearing which has fewer rollers (18 vs 23) and more steeply angled raceways. Used on ICE and TGV very high speed trains, these bearings would, if anything, be slightly over-engineered for the class 91 application. As a result, Timken NG2 bearings with Shell Nerita 2858 grease were trialled on three class 91 locos. The result of this trial was fatigue spalling after 170,000 miles, so they too were withdrawn from service.

Because there was no theoretical reason why the Timken bearings hadn’t given the desired results, it was at this time that possible bogie geometry issues began to be considered. An investigation revealed that the bogie frame pads were not flat and that there were significant variations in component tolerances. Ultimately, half of the class 91 bogie frames required re-machining. Bearings were meanwhile being changed out at half life (375,000 miles) with resultant high labour and materials costs and adverse effects on loco availability.

Lateral float

Timken NG2 bearings with Shell Nerita 2858 grease were giving excellent performance on ICE trains, with no fatigue failure or grease degradation even after one million kilometres. ICE bogies have coil spring primary suspension but a lateral stiffness of just 9MN/m as against 22MN/m on Class 91. Crucially, on ICE the bearings are free to float laterally in the axlebox and are not clamped. Accordingly, a Class 91 was fitted with four different wheelset configurations, all having floating axleboxes.

The trial was then extended to four locos with NG2 and Nerita 2858 during 2008. They ran successfully to 450,000km (two locos) and 550,000km (two locos). This showed that the problem had been with the bogie, not the Timken bearings. From early 2010 Timken NG2 bearings have been fitted at scheduled loco overhauls. Heavy maintenance periodicity remains at 425,000km, but a plan to restructure this has been initiated. Rather than being based on bearings (450,000km max) this will now be based around wheel life. The benefits are greater availability, simplicity and reduced costs.

Coordinated approach

Iain Nairne is fleet overhaul manager at Southern. His fleet comprises over 300 units made up of more than 1,100 vehicles. Each weekday 2,300 diagrams are operated, adding up to 33 million train miles per year, and yet Southern maintains a combined fleet availability of over 92%. Southern has one Atlas tandem wheel lathe, located at its Selhurst overhaul facility, with all fleets receiving wheel turning based on condition.

During his recent IMechE presentation, Iain described how the workload is optimised by turning between peak periods which avoids any units having to wait in a queue. Turning is mainly undertaken to remove wheel tread cavities and wheelflats, although it can also correct flange wear, tread wear and rollover.

Southern uses the WheelChex system to detect wheelset problems. WheelChex is a brand name for a Wheel Impact Load Detector (WILD) system developed by DeltaRail. The system has been used effectively by Southern and many other operators within the UK and overseas. At the WheelChex site at Salfords on the Brighton main line, about 175,000 Southern trains pass each year, making up 74% of the total fleet. Southern trains account for only 9% of the level 1 warnings generated, the balance being overwhelmingly due to freight operations.

In his presentation, Iain Nairne outlined how he has undertaken a case study on Southern’s class 377 Electrostar fleet which has highlighted the fact that a small but significant number of wheel bearings require premature exchange due to defects. Class 377 was the last fleet to utilise 120mm bearings, the new standard being 130mm. Iain has established that lateral load is the primary cause of defects, although electrical damage (traction return current) is also a factor. To detect this, train riders have travelled on every class 377 unit on a 28 day cycle, but using human perception to detect wheel bearing faults has proved difficult. It was even harder to pinpoint them to specific wheelsets, with half of the wheelsets removed having no defects.

Iain went on to describe how a complementary system to WheelChex, known as RailBAM®, can be used to detect wheel bearing defects and pinpoint them to specific wheelsets within a train consist. Australian company Trackside Intelligence Pty Ltd (Track IQ) developed the RailBAM (Rail Bearing Acoustic Monitor) system and is now working with Siemens to lead sales in the UK and Continental Europe. Using acoustic principles it is able to detect bearing defects up to 100,000 miles in advance of final bearing failure. RFID (radio-frequency identification) tags allow trains to be identified and defects to be monitored over time.

RailBAM was successfully trialled on Southern over a 5-month period in 2007, during which 24 bearing defects were reported, with just one false report. The mature system has since been successfully deployed at Swaythling (2009) and Mortlake (2011) on the Wessex Route to monitor the whole of the South West Trains fleet, as well as trains from other TOCs and FOCs passing the sites.

Weibull analysis

Chris Tait, fleet projects and contracts manager First ScotRail, has made use of a concept that might not be familiar to many of us – that of Weibull Analysis. Sometimes termed reliability life data analysis, it attempts to make predictions about the life of all products in a population. It does this by fitting a statistical distribution to the “life data” gained from a representative sample of units. Chris has successfully utilised the Weibull analysis technique to improve wheelset management on the First ScotRail class 170 DMU fleet.

ScotRail has four maintenance depots but just one wheel lathe, located at Shields depot, Glasgow. The class 170 fleet comprises 59 3-car sets – 41 Express units and 18 Suburban units. The class 170 express units average 178,000 miles a year while the suburban units cover about 132,000 miles. Both have a planned wheelset renewal periodicity of 715,000 miles and a planned re-profile cut every 140,000 miles. The wheels are designed to the standard P8 profile.

Wheel lathe data from Shields depot was used to determine the average number of days from known good wheel to damaged wheel. This was then converted into average mileage. Ten samples from each vehicle wheel position were used in the analysis. An average wear rate per millimetre was determined for each wheel position, allowing a wheel wear predictor to be established.

The Weibull characteristic life result for class 170 shows a clear distinction between driving vehicles and centre vehicles.

The results were compared to WheelChex wheel impact alerts from January 2010 to August 2011. These supported the findings of the Weibull analysis, demonstrating that the middle vehicle wheels exhibit fewer wheel impacts and therefore require less tyre turning than the outer vehicle’s wheels.

Chris Tait says, “Weibull and WheelChex data analysis has identified that a staggered tyre turning regime is more applicable for the class 170 fleet. The review of tyre turning periodicity using Weibull analysis has identified the current 140,000 miles is no longer optimal. A staggered periodicity is more suitable, at 150,000 miles for driving vehicles and 185,000 miles for middle vehicles.”

Implementation of the staggered tyre-turning regime will result in each unit requiring seven wheel lathe operations from bogie overhaul to overhaul. There are currently five operations with the 140,000 mile periodicity and it is thought that the increase in visits to the Shields Depot wheel lathe will be compensated by quicker turnaround times and flexibility within depot work patterns.

Evolution

Wheelsets are of course important drivers for vehicle availability and therefore for customer service. They can also be key components in causing damage and cost to infrastructure. Safely prolonging the life of these expensive items has already paid dividends, but this brief insight belies the extent of the ongoing work.

Clever engineering, pragmatic problem solving and the use of new techniques and technology will continue to optimise the balance between wheelset safety, performance and cost, underlining what we’ve known for a long time – that engineering excellence needs to lie at the heart of any modern, efficient railway system.

Making bridges under Eurocodes

0

In recent years, engineers have had to adapt to the increasing use of Eurocodes in all forms of design. Rail bridges are not exempt from this, and in issue 82 of the rail engineer (August 2011), Mungo Stacey looked at the implications for designers.

Since then, the first steel rail bridges designed using Eurocodes have reached the fabrication and installation stage. The steel fabrication industry has been preparing for this evolution over several years in order to be ready for the changes and new approaches contained within the new standards.

Two of the first rail structures designed and installed to Eurocodes are currently in the process of fabrication. These are the Hitchin Flyover in Hertfordshire, and Loughor Viaduct in South Wales. As is reported elsewhere in this issue, the first steel spans have been completed at Hitchin, with the assembly work at Loughor due to start later this year.

Euronorms

Steel bridges are designed in accordance with EN1993 and EN1994 if a composite structure. In addition to this, fabricators work in accordance with EN1090-2: The Execution of Steel Structures which covers the fabrication of hot rolled, cold formed, plate, section and stainless steels up to S690 and S700 grades. Whilst EN1090-2 applies primarily to Eurocode designs, it can be used for structures designed according to other design rules.

In addition to EN1090-2, a specification document is also required by the fabricator. As yet, Network Rail has not produced a standard specification for Eurocode designs, so current designs have specifications which are produced on a scheme-by-scheme basis. Designers produce these by combining guidance from the SCI (Steel Construction Institute) Model Project Specification, PD6705 and any existing Network Rail requirements. It is expected that, as more structures are installed using the new codes, then a standard Network Rail specification will be developed.

One of the key differences between BS5400 and EN1090-2 is the concept of the Execution Class. This relates to a set of requirements specified for the execution of the works as a whole, or of an individual component or of a detail of a component. For structural steel there are four classes ranging from 1 to 4, with 4 reserved for the most critical of steel fabrications.

There are two elements in the definition of an execution class. The first is the selection of a consequence class; fundamentally what would happen should the element fail. The second is the service category or the usage of a structure. The default class for bridges has been set at EXC 3 with additional elements at EXC 4 if required.

As might be expected, there are differences between EXC 3 and EXC 4 requirements and these will result in higher fabrication costs for EXC 4 work. These differences include tighter thickness tolerances, edge quality limits on thermal cutting, higher acceptance criteria on fillet and butt welding, and higher levels of inspection post welding and on bolt tightening. Clearly, designers should ensure that they only specify EXC 4 when justified, otherwise cost will be added to projects.

Tolerances and traceability

Within EN1090-2 there are three types of geometrical tolerance defined, and these are; essential tolerances, functional tolerances and special tolerances.

Essential tolerances set basic limits in order to satisfy the design assumptions for structures in terms of mechanical resistance and stability. This would include controlling eccentricity on stiffeners. Functional tolerances are those which are required to meet a function other than mechanical resistance and stability, for example, appearance or fit up requirements. Functional tolerances are further divided into Class 1 and Class 2, with Class 2 being more onerous than Class 1. It is therefore recommended that Class 1 tolerances are specified. Special tolerances are those not covered by the tabulated types given in EN1090-2 and which need to be specified in a particular case.

Within EN1090-2 there is a requirement for traceability of all elements in a fabricated structure. Not only do these requirements cover plate or rolled sections, but fasteners, consumables and paint. These items can be controlled by either ensuring that constituents are selected which are produced from standards listed in EN1090-2, or by checking that a particular product has conformity against a relevant standard. Additionally, controls must be in place within the factory to record which components are used and where.

As might be expected, there are a large number of other areas controlled by EN1090-2, but the requirements and controls are broadly similar to requirements in previous standards. Such areas include records and record keeping, inspection and testing, mechanical fasteners, preparation and assembly, welding, surface treatment, corrosion protection and erection.

CE marking

Meeting the requirements of EN1090-2 is essential to achieving CE marking for structural steelwork and this will be mandatory from 2013. However, CE marking does not only depend on compliance with EN1090-2, but also requires the fabricator to be certified for Factory Production Control in accordance with EN 1090-1. Key to this certification process is ensuring that welding is of an appropriate quality and organisations will be required to ensure a high level of technical competence by providing welding engineers and coordinators.

In the course of fabricating the first two structures to the requirements of Eurocodes, Mabey Bridge has encountered a few issues where the current requirements in the Eurocodes are unclear. Post assembly plate butt welds which are ground flush are not defined for fatigue in EN1993-1-9. This classification means that this type of weld is now more critical than a transverse fillet weld onto the same plate. The consequence of this is that butt welds cannot be positioned near the mid-point in a girder without a fatigue assessment being completed. Under BS5400 this type of weld would have been permitted. One other change that has been noted is in the limits on plate thickness for subgrades which result in NL grade, which calls up a low temperature impact test as part of the inspection regime, being required on thinner plates than previously. This can lead to increased material costs and longer lead times for the delivery of plate.

Clearly, the introduction of Eurocodes and CE marking has required a significant investment in time and development by fabricators. However, many are now ready to meet the challenges presented by the new requirements. With the first structures fully constructed to Eurocodes, there will be a period of time where Network Rail, engineers and fabricators develop and refine the technical specifications to arrive at a common set of guidelines which are well understood. These guidelines will enable Network Rail to produce a specification document which can be followed by everyone, but until this is complete there will be differences in interpretation.

It is important to understand that the Eurocodes have a different language and approach to BS5400. However, the fabrication industry is ready for the challenges and understands the requirements. Fabricators can provide a significant amount of technical support and guidance throughout the development of a project. Designers are always encouraged to engage with the industry to discuss these issues, preferably earlier rather than later in the project. Through this engagement, technical issues can be clarified early in the design process, thereby ensuring the most efficient solutions are developed.

 

Docklands Light Railway usage up by more than half

Docklands Light Railway (DLR) passenger figures are up 65 per cent with extra Olympic traffic.

Other statistics released by LOCOG show that the number of vehicles on London’s streets have fallen by 17 per cent since the stat of the Games.

Organisers have again predicted an extremely busy day on the London Underground, London Overground and DLR services, with late evening services expected to be busier than usual because of spectators returning from Wembley.

There are currently minor delays between Bank and Lewisham and between Stratford and Greenwich due to an earlier signal failure at Canary Wharf.

In February, new signalling software was installed across the DLR network in time for the Games which would allow the system to recover more quickly from delays.

The history of London’s Olympic stations revealed

Since London’s first Olympics in 1908, the capital’s rail network has been at the centre of the Games’ success.

A new section in Network Rail’s virtual archive, which was launched in February, is celebrating the role of some of the stations which will be used by millions of spectators throughout the event.

Waterloo. London & South Western Railway. Victory Arch ‘Elevation of Main Entrance’. Photo: Network Rail.

Architectural plans and drawings of some of the capital’s biggest and busiest stations – including King’s Cross, Liverpool Street, London Bridge and Stratford – have been added to the archive, including detailed information about their history.

Vicky Stretch, Network Rail’s archivist, said: “With millions of visitors to Britain this summer, we wanted to add a special section on those stations in the capital that everyone will pass through.

“With everyone focused on this fortnight, it’s fascinating to also look back at how things were different in 1908 and 1948 as the rail sector was quite different then.”

In 2012, 11 million spectators are predicted to make their way to Olympic venues around the city, with 80 per cent expected to travel by rail.

In stark contrast to the incredible anticipation and preparation ahead of this year’s event, the 1908 Games were overshadowed by the Franco-British Exhibition, which was being held at the same time.

Forty years later, as London prepared to host the Games for a second time, the newly-nationalised British Railways showed its support for the Olympics by providing the railways with special Olympic flags and Olympic shields.

“We hope that the archive helps people to understand the incredibly detailed and beautiful architectural work carried out by some of the world’s greatest engineers, and are still important for engineers working for us today,” added Vicky Stretch.

Ricoh station plans up and running

After many false starts, the long-awaited go-ahead for a station serving Coventry’s Ricoh Arena has been approved by Coventry City Council.

Work on the station, situated on the Coventry to Nuneaton route, will start this December and be finished for December 2013.

Lack of a rail connection to the popular sporting venue, which has been hosting Olympic football matches throughout the Games, has long been a contentious issue, with plans submitted and rejected over the years.

It was originally envisaged that the station would be opened six years ago, at the same time as Ricoh Arena, but this was rejected by the government at the time.

During events at Ricoh Arena there will be four trains an hour from Coventry and two trains an hour from Nuneaton. The station will also have its own car park with around 50 spaces.

The line between Coventry and Nuneaton is an important freight route, used mainly by container trains.

“Lucky escape” for driver after vandals place concrete lids on rail line

0

A British Transport Police (BTP) officer described a train driver in Darlington as having a “lucky escape” after narrowly avoiding a collision with two concrete troughing lids.

The driver slammed on the emergency brakes and managed to stop the passenger service, which had been travelling at 40mph, as it approached Dinsdale station on July 26.

PC Gary Sykes, the investigating officer, said: “Two concrete troughing lids were ripped up from the side of the track and carried four to six feet before being deliberately placed onto the tracks.

“Due to the quick thinking actions of the driver, luckily the train narrowly avoided striking them, but this mindless act of vandalism could have been a lot worse. If the train had struck the troughing it could have easily derailed, causing serious injuries or even worse; the driver and passengers had a lucky escape.

“We believe it may have been more than one person responsible for this reckless crime due to the weight of the lids, and the distance they were carried, it would have been extremely difficult for one person to lift them on their own.

“I would appeal to anyone who may have any information which may be able to assist us in finding those responsible for this crime to contact us.”

Chiltern helps save bubble car from scrap yard

0

The fledgling Llanelly and Mynydd Mawr Railway, located on the site of the former Cynheidre colliery and which was Britain’s first operating public railway authorised by an act of Parliament, has taken delivery of former Chiltern bubble car 55019.

Saving 55019 from being cut up was only possible after considerable help from Chiltern Railways who ensured that the bubble car had a secure future after it became surplus to their requirements.

Chiltern is well known as the only train operator to use bubble cars in everyday service. Two of them, both restored to pristine condition, being based at Aylesbury depot where they see daily use on the Princes Risborough branch and are affectionately known by passengers as the Risborough rompers.

Project manager Des Thomas said: “We must express out thanks and appreciation to Chiltern Railways for the assistance which they have given to us during this process and for the enthusiastic support they continue to give our project.”

The LMMR would like to see 55019, probably painted in its original BR green livery, in passenger use within two years but need more volunteers to make this a reality. The railway houses two steam locomotives along with a number of diesel units and shunters.

2014 Sochi’s Winter Olympic Games trains receive online virtual tour

Russian Railways has launched an online virtual tour of the trains which will be transporting spectators and athletes at the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics.